Legal Opinion
Amato v. KPMG LLP
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 13, 2006No. 06CV39PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JONES, District Judge.
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
We have a plethora of motions before us which will be addressed in this Memorandum and Order. First, we have three Motions to Compel Arbitration and Stay All Proceedings, or Alternatively, for Additional Time to Respond to Complaint (docs. 7, 8, 10) filed by Defendants KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), Presidio Advisors LLC and Presidio Growth LLC (collectively, “Presidio”), and Deutsche Bank AG (“Deutsche Bank”) and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (“DBSI”) (collectively “Deutsche Bank Defendants”)- on January 13, 2006.…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alfano v. BDO Seidman, LLPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Epix v. MARSH & McLENNAN COMPANIESNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Cottman Transmission Systems, LLC v. KershnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Luna Music, LLC d/b/a Aqua Sounds v. Executive Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
- Plessen Eye, LLC v. Marshall and Sterling Enterprises, Inc., Marshall and Sterling St. Croix, Inc. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London on Policy No. B1230GP02941A17District Court, Virgin Islands · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.