Legal Opinion

Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 1996No. 95-705PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The issue before this court is whether the Arkansas Petroleum Trade Practices Act (Act 380 of 1993) violates the Arkansas Constitution by impinging on the due process rights, the equal protection rights, and the privileges and immunities of appellant Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. We hold that Act 380 is constitutionally infirm because of its failure to include an element of predatory intent for a violation. As a consequence, the Act is overbroad in its effect and impermissibly impinges on the due process rights of Ports Petroleum.

I. Facts

On April 20, 1993, Ports Petroleum…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Barry Wright Corporation v. Itt Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. McLane Co., Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Stapleton v. M.D. Limbaugh Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. McLane Southern, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API