Legal Opinion

Securities And Exchange Commission v. Prakash

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 12, 2025No. 5:23-cv-03300Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 23-cv-03300-BLF (SVK) COMMISSION, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING 9 MOTION TO QUASH OR v. FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 10 VIDUL PRAKASH, Re: Dkt. No. 56 11 Defendant. 12 Based on little more than his say-so, non-party Amar Shah requests that the Court prohibit 13 Defendant Vidul Prakash from deposing him. See Dkt. 56 (the “Motion”). Because Mr. Shah 14 fails to satisfy his evidentiary burden, the Court DENIES the Motion.1 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission alleges…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Stormans Inc v. Mary SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Shankman v. Northwest Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API