Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 18, 1998No. Docket Nos. 97-4050, 97-4070, 97-2629, 97-2599 and 97-2600PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge:
These cases concern the scope of federal court jurisdiction to review the legality of deportation orders issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the “INS”). The petitioners before us are legal permanent residents of the United States who have been ordered deported because of them past criminal convictions. They challenge the Attorney General’s interpretation of the immigration laws under which they face deportation. While the statutory provisions before us today are new ones,1 the questions raised by these cases are old. Guided by a century’s worth of…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franklin Henderson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Engin Yesil v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Immigration and Naturalization Service John B.Z. Caplinger, District Director Nancy Hooks, Officer in Charge, Guillermo Mojica v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Barton v. AshcroftDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001