Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Halvorson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1988No. A8508-05317; CA A42945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This dispute arose between plaintiffs, the owners of property on a portion of the Oregon Coast known as “Big Whale Cove,” and defendants, the owners of adjacent property to the north on which “Little Whale Cove” is situated, over whether each had access to the other’s cove.

Plaintiffs brought this lawsuit seeking to quiet title against defendants’ claim of a prescriptive easement over a trail on plaintiffs’ land that runs south from Little Whale Cove to Big Whale Cove, and requesting a declaratory judgment that their property includes a portion of the “dry-sand area” of Little Whale Cove,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. HalvorsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API