Legal Opinion

Kaczala v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1973No. 725SC842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Appellants assign as errors the court’s allowing a police officer to testify over objection that his investigation revealed that the fire truck ran through a red light, and the court’s recapitulation of that evidence in its charge to the jury. The assignments of error are sustained.

The officer in question was presented as a witness by plaintiff. The record pertaining to his cross-examination reveals:

“Q. As a result of your conversation or your investigation, did your investigation reveal that the fire truck had run through the red light?

Objection. Overruled. Exception.

Exception…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. SylvesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Jones v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. McGinnis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Farrow v. BaughamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Kaczala v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Kaczala v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API