Kaczala v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Appellants assign as errors the court’s allowing a police officer to testify over objection that his investigation revealed that the fire truck ran through a red light, and the court’s recapitulation of that evidence in its charge to the jury. The assignments of error are sustained.
The officer in question was presented as a witness by plaintiff. The record pertaining to his cross-examination reveals:
“Q. As a result of your conversation or your investigation, did your investigation reveal that the fire truck had run through the red light?
Objection. Overruled. Exception.
Exception…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shaw v. SylvesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Jones v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- McGinnis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Farrow v. BaughamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Kaczala v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Kaczala v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975