Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gilbert
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 21, 1979No. 76 Civ. 366PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
In this action, the Securities and Exchange Commission charges that the nineteen defendants illegally manipulated the price of Conrac Corporation common stock.
One of the defendants, Bank De L’Union Europeenne En Suisse S. A. (Bank Union) moves for an order dismissing the action against it on the grounds that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over it. Bank Union contends that its contacts with this forum are insufficient to support jurisdiction over it, and that in any event jurisdiction has not attached because Bank Union was never properly served with the summons…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum of the Securities & Exchange Commission v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. Caxton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Perez-Rubio v. WyckoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Michelson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Maiden v. BiehlDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.