Legal Opinion

Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum of the Securities & Exchange Commission v. Knowles

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1996No. 95-1425PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

This case arises out of the enforcement by the district court against the appellant, a foreign national, of two administrative subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The appellant argues that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction to enforce the subpoenas. The district court held that it did not need personal jurisdiction over the appellant to do so.

The question presented is whether the appellant has the requisite minimum contacts to justify the district court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over him. This court holds that he…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SALCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Gucci America, Inc. v. Bank of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. Peay v. BellSouth Medical Assistance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API