Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum of the Securities & Exchange Commission v. Knowles
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
This case arises out of the enforcement by the district court against the appellant, a foreign national, of two administrative subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The appellant argues that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction to enforce the subpoenas. The district court held that it did not need personal jurisdiction over the appellant to do so.
The question presented is whether the appellant has the requisite minimum contacts to justify the district court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over him. This court holds that he…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SALCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Bank of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Peay v. BellSouth Medical Assistance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.