Legal Opinion

Beckwith Box Toe Co. v. Gowdy

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 5, 1916No. Nos. 628-630PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Three suits by the Beckwith Box Toe Company against one Gowdy and others. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

DODGE, Circuit Judge.

In each of these suits the defendants are charged with infringement of a different patent alleged to belong to the *806plaintiff company. The patent in question in the first case is No. 749,-267, issued January 12, 1904, to Oscar C. Davis, assignor of one-half to George E. Keith. In the second case it is No. 1,070,406, issued August 19, 1913, to Frank F. Butterfield, by Eugene M. Butterfield, administrator of Frank E., deceased, assigned to the plaintiff company, in the third case it is No. 1,124,694, issued January 12, 1915, to Frank E. Butterfield, by Eugene M. Butterfield,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Railroad Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Tate v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
  4. Forsyth v. GarlockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
  5. Wende v. HorineU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Schaum & Uhlinger, Inc. v. Copley-Plaza Operating Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
  4. Wright v. Dodge Bros.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
  5. Walsh v. Albert Wahle Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API