Legal Opinion
Fuston v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1927No. 5175PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Euston, alias Charley Bennett, plaintiff in error, was convicted of violation of section 28 of the Penal Code (18 USCA § 72), in that he made and forged a certain stockraising homestead application, by signing a false and fictitious name, Charley Bennett, to the application, and that he transmitted and presented the application to the office of the register of the United States land office at The Dalles, Or. He brought this writ of error.
By stipulation certain records were introduced. The government offered a homestead application made by Chester Euston in 1915 (Exhibit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Williams v. CongerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rogers v. RitterSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BobCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Walter J. Sawyer. Walter J. Sawyer v. Max A. Barczak, Sheriff of Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Frank G. Robles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Commonwealth v. GlymanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003