Legal Opinion

United States v. Bob

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 26, 1939No. 377PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Of the defendants who appeal here, Bob and Rogers appeal from a judgment of conviction upon an indictment charging them in five counts with using the mails in execution of a scheme to defraud, and in one count with conspiring to that end, in the sale of stock of Coronado Gold Mines, Inc., and Kelly Gold & Silver Mines, Inc. 18 U.S.C.A. § 338 and 18 U.S.C.A. § 88. The third defendant, Wiseman, was not convicted on the conspiracy count and therefore appeals only from his conviction on the five counts of using the mails to defraud. In addition to the three defendants here,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. DilliardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. United States v. RollnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. Fuston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  4. United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Milton SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API