Legal Opinion

Elberton Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The question presented by the demurrer and upon this appeal is whether, upon the facts alleged in the complaint and exhibits annexed, the failure of the plaintiff to file its itemized claim of loss within ninety days after the notice of July 15th, 1927, works a forfeiture of its right to recover. The contention of the defendant is that the provisions of the policy agreement must be construed as compelling such a result in every case where the filing of the claim is deferred beyond the ninety-day period, whatever the length of the delay or the circumstances of the case. “That such a view would…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Welch v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Lee v. Casualty Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Pierce v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  5. Mason v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. King v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Scranton v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
  5. Fields v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API