Legal Opinion

Lang v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1913No. 1012PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29661 (T. D. 32801)-.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This importation consisted of so-called bouillon cubes. The record shows them to be, as conceded by all parties to this controversy, manufactured articles made of extract of vegetables with a trace of extract of meat sufficient for bases. The merchandise was held by the board in affirming the collector’s decision to be dutiable by similitude to "extract of meat” under paragraphs 481 and 287 of the tariff act of 1909.

The appellant, importer, claims the goods dutiable by similitude under paragraphs 481 and 252 of said act as "vegetables * * * prepared in any way”; or, in the alternative, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Wills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Arthur v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cresca Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. Corporacion Argentina De Productores De Carnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API