Mitchell v. Westover
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
Plaintiff administrator seeks recovery from the Collector on two claims for refund with interest of alleged estate-tax overpayment. Int.Rev.Code, §§ 3771, 3772, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 3771, 3772. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 56 (a, b), 28 U.S.C.A. The material facts as disclosed by the pleadings and pre-trial stipulations are not in dispute.
On October 3, 1947, plaintiff filed his estate tax return and paid the amount shown to be due. Credit was not claimed in the return for amounts previously remitted to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- City of Philadelphia v. the CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Busser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dubuque Packing Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1954
- Budd Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Herrick v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1952