Herrick v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
This is a motion by the plaintiffs, as executors of the estate of Ethelbert Ide Low, for a summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. At the hearing on the motion, leave was granted to the defendant to move orally for summary judgment in their favor. The plaintiffs have filed affidavits in support of its motion. The defendant has not filed any opposing affidavits and makes no contention that the facts as set forth in support of the plaintiffs’ motion are not true.
The facts relevant to the motions are essentially as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. CliseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Mearkle's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Higgs' Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Wilder's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dubuque Packing Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1954
- Rosenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1961
- Feathers v. On Q Financial LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Rodriguez v. Equal Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
- TigerGraph, Inc. v. PeakDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020