Legal Opinion
United States v. Bouchey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 23, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-952 SSHPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendant Wendell Harbour’s motions to dismiss the complaint and amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 The Court denies defendant’s motions. Although “[findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12,” the Court nonetheless sets forth its analysis. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
Background
The government contends that from 1987 to 1989, Harbour participated in an alleged conspiracy to charge the United States inflated rates for consulting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Norman I. Gold v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Black River Constructors, Fort Drum Constructors, and National Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Mikes v. StraussDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- US Ex Rel. Harris v. BernadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. Folliard v. CDW Technology Services., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.