Legal Opinion

Krall v. Lull

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County.

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, C. J.

This appeal, being on the calendar of last term, was affirmed under the rule, for nonappearance of the appellant.

The appellant makes this motion at this term, within sixty days after the affirmance (R. S., § 3071), in the nature of a motion for a rehearing (Bonin v. Railway Co., 43 Wis., 210), to reinstate the appeal.

The failure of the appellant to prepare for the hearing of the appeal was manifestly owing to a misunderstanding between the counsel of the respective parties. And the appellant ought to be relieved on terms, if he can he.

The question is, whether the statute authorizing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pringle v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Bonin v. Green Bay & Minnesota Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ott v. BoringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Patten Paper Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hocks v. SprangersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API