Pringle v. Dunn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaulcee County. ' In this action to foreclose a mortgage, the trial court having rendered a judgment in favor of all the defendants, this court, on appeal, at the January term, 1875, held that the mortgage was valid, though not so recorded as to constitute constructive, notice, and that the defendants Mólloy* and Partoz were chargeable with actual notice; and it reversed the judgment. below as to them.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaulcee County. ' In this action to foreclose a mortgage, the trial court having rendered a judgment in favor of all the defendants, this court, on appeal, at the January term, 1875, held that the mortgage was valid, though not so recorded as to constitute constructive, notice, and that the defendants Mólloy* and Partoz were chargeable with actual notice; and it reversed the judgment. below as to them. See 37 Wis., 449-468. At the January term, 1876, it appearing that tlie papers in tbe cause bad never been remitted, tliis court, on Molloy's motion,…
1Opinion of the CourtRyaN, C. J.
There were numerous defendants in this cause, respondents in this court, and tbe record was voluminous and complicated. Tbe appeal was_ argued at tbe bar for some five days, early in tbe June term, 1874, and was decided tbe last of May in tbe January term, 1875. Tbe latter term was not finally adjourned until July; so that tbe time for moving for a rehearing under tbe rule expired in June, 1875.
Tbe respondent Thomas Molloy now moves for leave to make a motion for rehearing. And tbe only question on tbe motion is, whether such leave should now be given. Tbe merits of tbe appeal are not before…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ætna Life Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
- Pringle v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Scheer v. KeownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Spafford v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Attorney General ex rel. Cushing v. LumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ott v. BoringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Salter v. HilgenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Ean v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Tomberlin v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.