Luce v. State Title Agency, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
David and Joyce Luce (“Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to State Title Agency, Inc. (“State Title”). Appellants claim that State Title owed them a duty of reasonable care and skill when it gratuitously recorded a deed of trust for a third party. The trial court found that State Title had no duty to Appellants. We affirm.
I
In January 1988 Appellants entered into a partnership (“the Partnership”) with Daniel O’Connor and a company that he wholly owned. O’Connor and his company were general partners and Appellants were limited partners. In return…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Centurion Properties III, LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Centurion Properties III, LLC v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Valles v. Pima CountyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Centurion Props. III, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.