Legal Opinion

Centurion Properties III, LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2016No. 91932-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

¶1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified the following question to this court: “Does a title company owe a duty of care to third parties in the recording of legal instruments?” We answer the certified question no and hold that title companies do not owe a duty of care to third parties in the recording of legal instruments. Such a duty is contrary to Washington’s policy and precedent, and other duty of care considerations.

FACTS

¶2 This certified question arises from a civil action for money damages filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Keodalah v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. William Merriman, et ux v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. City of Seattle v. Monsanto Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  4. Dalton M, LLC v. N. Cascade Tr. Servs., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Adelina A MorenoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API