City of Springfield v. Bradley
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Acting Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff City of Springfield brought this action to enforce the lien of a special tax bill. Upon trial, the court found for the defendants. The plaintiff, to whom we shall refer as the city, has appealed. The question presented is whether the city’s construction of a sanitary sewer line across the defendants’ lot conferred a taxable special benefit upon the defendants’ property. The trial court found it did not. We agree and affirm the judgment.
The Sewer District here involved is Sanitary Sewer District 36E of Section 15. It is part of the sanitary sewer system…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Upper Moreland-Hatboro Joint Sewer Authority v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Nev-Cal Electric Securities Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Lakewood Park Cemetery Ass'n v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- City of Webster Groves to Use of Wise v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.