Rice v. State

The appellant assigns as error, in this court, the overruling by the court below of—

1. The motion to- quash the affidavit and information.

2. The motion for a new trial.

The affidavit upon which the information was-based, omitting the signature and jurat., reads as follows:

‘‘State of Indiana, v. George Rice. )

Warren Circuit Court.

October Term, 1895.

“Balzer Kramer, being duly sworn on his oath, says, that on October 10, 1895, at said county and State, George Rice did then and there in a rude-, insolent, and angry manner, unlawfully touch, beat, and strike the person of him, the said Balzer…