Legal Opinion

Elder v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1884No. 11,701PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

This was a criminal prosecution upon affidavit and information, under section 1679, R. S. 1881. The-*163affidavit and information were both in two counts. The first count of each charged the crime of burglary, and each second count charged grand larceny.

The defendant, the appellant here, upon oath, pleaded in abatement that the Clay Circuit Court had no lawful jurisdiction either of the defendant or over the subject-matter of the prosecution, because there had been no indictment returned against him for the offences with which he stood charged, but that he was held for trial on the charges of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hodge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Heanley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. City of Indianapolis v. NavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gilson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API