Legal Opinion
Adams v. Pipeliners Union 798
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1985No. S-181PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Pipeliners Union Local 798 of Tulsa, Oklahoma represented all welder helpers during the construction of the Trans-Alaska pipeline. The position of welder helper is unskilled and requires no special training. One of the Union’s functions was to dispatch helpers to work on the pipeline when helpers were requested by pipeline contractors. All dispatches were made by the Fairbanks office of the Union. However, helpers were selected for dispatch from the Union’s out-of-work list maintained in Tulsa, as well as from various sources in Alaska. Priority was given to those…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Era Aviation, Inc. v. LindforsAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Turner v. Alaska Communications Systems Long Distance, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Adams v. Pipeliners Union 798Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Clifford William Tagaban v. Kake Tribal Corporation, Frederick Charles Nauska, Sr., and Harold Martin, for Himself and for All Others Who are Similarly SituatedAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.