Legal Opinion

Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2009No. S-12725PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Consumers seeking to bring a class action alleged that four auto dealerships failed to make statutorily mandated disclosures when selling used vehicles. T'wo of the dealerships moved to dismiss the complaint against them because the consumers had not specifically alleged that class representatives purchased vehicles at those dealerships. The superior court dismissed the consumers' claims against those two dealerships and entered final judgment in favor of the two dealerships. Although the superior court did not err in concluding that the consumers…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Delvin C. Payton v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kanuk Ex Rel. Kanuk v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Brown v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API