Legal Opinion

Turner v. Alaska Communications Systems Long Distance, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2003No. S-10692PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioners, representing a class suing Alaska Communications Systems Long Distance, Inc. and Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. for terminating a widely advertised calling plan, contest a class notification that suggests that the court may hold absent class members liable for defendants' attorney's fees if the class suffers an adverse judgment. We conclude that holding these absent class members liable for attorney's fees upon an adverse judgment will chill class participation and hamper the efficiencies of class litigation. We therefore…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Earley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monzingo v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Catalina Yachts v. PierceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hernandez v. VITAMIN SHOPPE INDUSTRIES INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Martinez v. Cape Fox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Avens v. Cotton Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API