Legal Opinion
Stolz v. Board of Regents of the University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 24, 1957PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarpern, J.
This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of the Board of Begents suspending the petitioner’s license to practice medicine for one year.
The petitioner was charged with fraud or deceit in the practice of medicine within the purview and meaning of paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 6514 of the Education Law, in that he had issued prescriptions for narcotic drugs in various false names for the purpose of supplying the drugs to one George Lockwood. It was also charged that he had pleaded guilty to a violation of section 438 (now § 3351) of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- MATTER OF BARSKY v. Bd. of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by84 opinions
- Tucker v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- 17 Cameron St. Restaurant Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Quintard Associates, Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Goldsmith v. DeBuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Heslop v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.