Legal Opinion
MATTER OF BARSKY v. Bd. of Regents
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1953PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
These are proceedings, brought under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review determinations of respondent Board of Regents, suspending for certain periods the medical licenses of petitioners Barsky and Auslander, and *95censuring and reprimanding petitioner Miller. In each instance the board found authority for its action in paragraph (b) of subdivision 2 of section 6514 of the Education Law, which authorizes disciplinary action against a physician who ‘£ has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction, either within or without this state, of a crime ’ ’. The question on this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Stolz v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- County of Nassau v. CanavanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pell v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- De Veau v. BraistedNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.