Legal Opinion

Chaffee v. US Fid. & Guar. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1979No. 14109PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

delivered the opinion of the Court..

The parties to this action proceeded in the District Court of the First Judicial District, Court of Lewis and Clark, on an agreed statement of facts. They were seeking resolution of a coverage question concerning uninsured motorist insurance issued to appellant Chaffee by respondent United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF&G). The District Court held that Chaffee, as administrator of his deceased son’s estate, was not entitled to combine the policy limits of his insurance based on the number of premiums paid on several vehicles insured under one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sullivan v. DoeMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Cunningham v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Hardy v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mitchell v. State Farm InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Modroo v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API