Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baker v. Endeavor Servs., Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2018No. S-1-SC-36651Published

1Dissent

NAKAMURA, Chief Justice (dissenting).

*274{35} Worker failed to offer terms resolving all of the disputed matters necessary to determine whether his settlement offer was less than the compensation awarded. Accordingly, Worker is not entitled to fee shifting. Both the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) and Court of Appeals were correct and should be affirmed. For these reasons, I dissent.

{36} "New Mexico has traditionally followed the American Rule by which each litigant is ordinarily responsible for its own attorney's fees." Carrillo v. Compusys, Inc. , 2002-NMCA-099, ¶ 10, 132 N.M. 710, 54 P.3d…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Madrid v. St. Joseph HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Leonard v. Payday ProfessionalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Albuquerque Hilton Inn v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Meyers v. Western Auto & CNA InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Ortiz v. BTU Block & Concrete Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API