Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Perrotta
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1970PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHyman Korn, J.
Petitioner, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, moves by order to show cause to direct the Finance Administrator of the City of New York to deliver to petitioner warrants totaling $17,813. Associated Factors Corp. (hereinafter called Associated) cross-moves for an order pursuant to article 78 of the CPLB, to compel the Finance Administrator to deliver to it warrants totaling $14,033. In effect, both parties are seeking to recover moneys presently held by city and payable to a defaulting contractor, M. K. B. Industries, Inc. (hereinafter called MKB). It appears that MKB, a general contractor,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Jacobs v. Northeastern Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Vulcan Rail & Construction Co. v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. State Public School Building Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1961
3Cited by10 opinions
- In The Matter Of J. V. Gleason Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Finance Co. of America v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Alaska State Bank v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.