Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Porter P.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 31, 2008No. 07-P-654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.

The defendant (a juvenile) and his mother lived in a bedroom, to which they had keys, in the Roxbury MultiService Center Family House Shelter (shelter). Their occupancy of that room was conditioned upon their acceptance of various shelter policies, rules, and regulations, set forth in the resident’s manual (manual), which is designed to promote safety in the shelter and includes a prohibition on the possession of weapons. Toward that end, as residents, they were subject to limitations on their privacy, including access by the director to their rooms, and random and routine searches of their…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PORTER P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. TremblayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. PORTER P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. PORTER P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API