Legal Opinion

Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Meyers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1922No. 10075PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

The appellee, H. E. Meyers, instituted this suit against the Wichita Valley Railway Company, and the Abilene & Northern Railway Company, alleging them to be partners, for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him, and also for injuries to the horse which he was riding, by the horse falling with him on the railroad track of the deferidant at a street crossing in the city of Abilene, Tex. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were negligent in not properly constructing and maintaining their track at the crossing in question, and in failing to restore the street to its original…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central & Montgomery Railroad v. Morris & CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. NewellTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. West Texas Coaches, Inc. v. MadiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. County of Alameda v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. HouzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Hays v. Texarkana & Ft. Smith Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. County of Alameda v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API