Legal Opinion
Qualls v. Rumsfeld
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 7, 2005No. CIV.A.04-2113(RCL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Now before the court is plaintiff David W. Quail’s Motion [5] for Preliminary Injunction. For the- reasons stated herein, the court denies this motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff David W. Qualls, affiliated with the United States Army from 1986-1994, reenlisted in the Army National Guard’s Try One program on July 7, 2003 for a term of service lasting one year, zero months, and zero days. Soon thereafter, in mid-October of 2003, the Army called Qualls to active duty and extended his term of service, changing his Expiration of Term of Service…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Qualls v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005