Legal Opinion
People v. Reinard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court should have suppressed a statement that he made to an investigator at police headquarters following his arrest. The evidence at the Huntley hearing supports the court’s conclusion that the statement was spontaneous and not the product of police interrogation or its functional equivalent (see, People v Huffman, 61 NY2d 795, cert denied 515 US 1167; People v Strickland, 151 AD2d 978, 979, lv denied 74 NY2d 819; People v Allnutt, 148 AD2d 993, lv denied 74 NY2d 736).
Defendant further contends that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. HuffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GarrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. LaporteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DePonceauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. HaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. KeetonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998