Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Hokanson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1998No. B120052PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CURRY, J.

Appellant Jon E. Hokanson and cross-appellant Mary L. Palmer challenge an order of the family court distributing the assets from the sale of the family house. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.

*990Relevant Factual and Procedural Background* 1

Jon and Mary were married on November 12, 1983.2 They separated in October 1993, and Mary petitioned for dissolution of marriage.

In March 1994, Mary contacted RE/MAX Palos Verdes Realty, a real estate broker, and obtained a marketing analysis of the family house located in the Palos Verdes area from Agent Lynne Droubay. Droubay…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Leslie G. v. Perry & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. Jerry R.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Exxon Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Fossum v. FossumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Rossi v. RossiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Hoogenberg v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Michaely v. MichaelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API