Wiesmann v. Shanley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Kenosha county: E. B. BeldeN, Circuit Judge. The appeal is by plaintiff from an order striking out, as irrelevant and redundant, certain portions of the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.
Orders striking out parts of pleadings were in some cases held appealable under subd. 4, sec. 3069, R. S. 1878, as involving “the merits of the action or some part thereof.” Freeman v. Engelmann T. Co. 36 Wis. 571; Carpenter v. Reynolds, 58 Wis. 666, 17 N. W. 300; Dewald v. Dewald, 89 Wis. 353, 62 N. W. 175. That subdivision was eliminated by ch. 212, Laws of 1895. Adamson v. Raymer. 94 Wis. 243, 250, 68 N. W. 1000. Since then no statute is claimed to confer appealability upon such orders, except, perhaps, subd. 1, sec. 3069, Stats. 1898. That, however, can-mot be effective, for the order,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adamson v. RaymerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Flannigan v. LindgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Freeman v. Engelmann Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Carpenter v. ReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Dewald v. DewaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gilbert v. HoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Gooding v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Gauger v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Bolick v. GallagherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.