Legal Opinion

Bolick v. Gallagher

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

When allegations are made a part of an answer which is pleaded in its entirety as an answer to a complaint, a motion to strike does not have the essentials *211of a demurrer, and an order made thereon is not an appeal-able order. Paraffine Companies v. Kipp, 219 Wis. 419, 263 N. W. 84. There are cases where an order made on a motion to strike out a portion of an answer when pleaded as a separate defense has been reviewed upon appeal on the ground that there was in effect a ruling on a demurrer. Williams v. Journal Co. 211 Wis. 362, 247 N. W. 435. The ruling on the challenge here of the relevancy…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bingham v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. National Distilling Co. v. Cream City Importing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Gilbert v. HoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Stafford v. General Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lounsbury v. EberleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Britz v. ChilsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Teegarden Co-operative Cheese Co. v. HeckmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API