Bolick v. Gallagher
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.
When allegations are made a part of an answer which is pleaded in its entirety as an answer to a complaint, a motion to strike does not have the essentials *211of a demurrer, and an order made thereon is not an appeal-able order. Paraffine Companies v. Kipp, 219 Wis. 419, 263 N. W. 84. There are cases where an order made on a motion to strike out a portion of an answer when pleaded as a separate defense has been reviewed upon appeal on the ground that there was in effect a ruling on a demurrer. Williams v. Journal Co. 211 Wis. 362, 247 N. W. 435. The ruling on the challenge here of the relevancy…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bingham v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- National Distilling Co. v. Cream City Importing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Gilbert v. HoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Stafford v. General Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Lounsbury v. EberleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Britz v. ChilsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Teegarden Co-operative Cheese Co. v. HeckmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.