Legal Opinion

Ossen v. Wanat

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 13, 1990No. 7575PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

This appeal involves a summary process action in which the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Jeffrey P. Ossen. The defendants1 appeal from that judgment claiming that the trial court erred (1) in finding that an oral month-to-month tenancy existed between the plaintiff and the defendant Gail Wanat, (2) in refusing to allow the defendants to sell their mobile home on the leased park site during the pendency of the summary process action, (3) in refusing to consider constitutional challenges to the summary process action,2 (4) in denying the defendants’ *42motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. CrumpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Fattibene v. KealeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Southland Corp. v. VernonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. Eamiello v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Ossen v. WanatSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. BartonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Centrix Management Co., LLC v. ValenciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Ansonia Acquisition I. LLC v. Francis, No. Hdsp-102429 (Nov. 18, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API