Legal Opinion
State v. Crump
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 2, 1986No. 11224PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The crimes involved in this case arose out of a robbery of a restaurant in Hartford on January 29, 1981. After a trial to the court, Kremski, J., the defendant, Elkie Lee Crump, was found guilty under both counts of a substitute information which charged the crimes of robbery in the second degree, in violation of General Statutes § SSa-lSB,1 and conspiracy to commit robbery in the second degree, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-135 and 53a-48.2 This appeal followed.
On appeal, the defendant claims that there was “insufficient evidence” to sustain the trial court’s finding that he was…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. CorreaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.