Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Brownell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1963No. Calendar 86, Docket 49,886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Charles M. Begole, in his lifetime was financially well circumstanced. Pie made testamentary disposition of his property in an instrument containing a number of specific charitable bequests, a bequest in trust for plaintiff’s decedent, and a residuary bequest. It is with the trust in its relationship to the residuary clause that we are here concerned. The trust was in the nature of a life interest in the investment return on the corpus. The concerned paragraph is hereinafter set forth in full:

“Sixth: — I give, devise and bequeath to the First National Bank at Flint Five Hundred Thousand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quarton v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mathews v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of United States & CanadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re Joy's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. L'HOMMEDIEU v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Flambeau River Lumber Co. v. Lake Superior District Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Avery v. Arnold Home, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Miller v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Flanagan v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Tait v. NashMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API