Legal Opinion

Flambeau River Lumber Co. v. Lake Superior District Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The principal argument made here in support of the defendant’s contention is that the complaint does not state a cause of action for th,e reason that it alleges conclusions of law rather than facts. In the view which we take of the matter many things are argued in briefs of counsel which are immaterial in determining whether or not a cause of action is stated in that part of the complaint demurred to.

The defendant relies upon Peake v. Buell, 90 Wis. 508, 63 N. W. 1053; Emond v. Kimberly-Clark Co. 159 Wis. 83, 149 N. W. 760; Moen v. Madison Rys. Co. 199 Wis. 168, 225 N. W. 821, and other cases…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emond v. Kimberly-Clark Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Peake v. BuellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Moen v. Madison Railways Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Flambeau River Lumber Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flynn v. BrownellMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API