Legal Opinion

McCurdy v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 1948No. [No. 95, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

The question involved in this ease is the construction of the residuary clause of the will of Charles M. Tickner. He died on January 27,1939 and his widow, L. Katherine, died August 16, 1946. By her will she left all her property to her two daughters and appointed them her executrices. The daughters, however, renounced, and the Safe Deposit and Trust Company was appointed administrator, C. T. A. In that capacity it filed the bill of complaint herein, asking the Circuit Court of Baltimore City to construe the will of Charles M. Tickner and declare that all of the residue of his estate went to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perin v. PerinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  2. Nicodemus National Bank v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Robinson v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Emmert v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. McElroy v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Neinast v. BrauckmullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Madden v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API