Legal Opinion

Neinast v. Brauckmuller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1966No. 14699PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERLEIN, Justice.

This suit was brought by Reuben Nein-ast and Oscar Neinast, Incompetents, acting by and through the Guardian of their persons and estates, William H. Neinast, appellants, for the purpose of construing the will of Albert Neinast, Deceased, and declaring the rights of appellants and ap-pellees thereunder. The will, which was duly admitted to probate as a muniment of title, is as follows:

THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BURLESON KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

That I, Albert Neinast, of the County of Washington and State of Texas, knowing the uncertainty of life and desiring to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Logan v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Briggs v. PeeblesTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Calvery v. CalveryTexas Supreme Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shriner's Hospital for Crippled Children of Texas v. StahlTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Estate of Hodges, Matter Of, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  3. Sanderson v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Najvar v. VasekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Morris v. FinkelsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API