Legal Opinion

Emmert v. Hearn

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 23, 1987No. 70 September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case concerns whether, under the will of George Roberts, the bequest of “all my personal property” includes intangible as well as tangible personalty.

I

The testator died in 1981, survived by seven of his eight children. His wife had predeceased him in 1970 and a son, Richard, had died in 1971, leaving one child, Brian. The testator’s will, executed in 1977, contained the following pertinent provisions:

“FIRST: I hereby direct my Personal Representatives hereinafter named to pay all of my just debts, and funeral expenses____

SECOND: I bequeath all my personal property to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bradford v. Eutaw Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Littig v. HanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. LeRoy v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Darden v. BrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Frick v. FrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pfeufer v. CyphersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. District of Columbia v. Estate of ParsonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Hays v. CoeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. McCree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Matter of Estate of RussellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API