Legal Opinion

Ball v. Harrison

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1943PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The defendant’s demurrer assigns as reasons therefor, that the plaintiff’s bill does not set forth any ground for relief in equity and that the plaintiff has a complete and adequate remedy at law. An interlocutory decree was entered sustaining the demurrer with leave to amend into an action at law within thirty days, and a final *391decree, dismissing the bill, was entered more than thirty days thereafter. The plaintiff appealed from both decrees.

The bill alleges that the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement by the terms of which the plaintiff, sometime after June 8, 1940, was to be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Stay Co. v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Shea v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Badger v. McNamaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Cheese Shop International, Inc. v. SteeleCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  3. Lerra v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
  4. Braunstein v. Panagiotou (In Re McCabe)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  5. Ryan v. McManusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API