Legal Opinion
People v. Naugle
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1986No. Docket 82487PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P.J.
In this matter we have the opportunity, for the first time, to set forth and describe the degree of specificity of the stated time or identity of the offense mandated by the following language in MCL 767.51; MSA 28.991:
[T]he court may on motion require the prosecution to state the time or identify the occasion [of the offense] as nearly as the circumstances will permit, to enable the accused to meet the charge.
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted on November 1, 1984, on four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b(1)(b); MSA 28.788(2)(1)(b), and one count of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. HowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. MikulaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. Kenneth JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. GainesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- United States v. James T. WhittedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Morales v. Michigan Parole Bd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. FawcettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.