Legal Opinion

State v. Fawcett

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 18, 1988No. 87-0692-CRPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Anthony Fawcett appeals from a judgment of conviction for two counts of first-degree sexual assault. Fawcett argues that his due process right to notice of the charges and his fifth amendment right against double jeopardy were violated by charging documents alleging that the sexual assaults occurred "during the six months preceding December A.D. 1985.” Fawcett also argues that he was deprived of due process and a fair trial when the prosecutor referred to him as a "classic child molester.” We reject both of Fawcett’s arguments and affirm the judgment.

In December of 1985, M.S. told his fourth…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. WoodsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Anthony Fawcett v. Stephen E. BablitchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. Joel M. HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. McElvaney v. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API