Legal Opinion
Cronin v. Adam A. Weschler & Son, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 15, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-1463PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
While Plaintiff Anne Cronin was renovating her house, she placed various furnishings in storage with the Prosperi Company. Believing Cronin had failed to pay its fee, Prosperi at some point sent the items to Defendant Adam A. Weschler & Son, Inc., to be auctioned. Upon learning of the pending auction, Plaintiff contacted Prosperi and Weschler’s to block the sale. Despite her payment of outstanding storage fees and assurances by both Prosperi and Weschler’s that the sale would not proceed, 37 lots of her items did end up being auctioned,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jsc Transmashholding v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jefferson v. CollinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of GreensburgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Magness Oil Company v. SCF RC Funding IV LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022