Legal Opinion

Bates v. Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1931No. 2 Div. 963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

(after stating the facts).

The appellant’s contention here is that the evidence shows, without dispute or room for adverse inference, that he and those under whom he claims have been in the actual, open, notorious, adverse possession of the strip of land in suit, for more than twenty years, and applying the doctrine of prescription he was entitled to the affirmative charge, which the court refused. The argument, as we understand it, concedes that the plaintiff established a paper title, by showing that Wesley Plattenburg, before he conveyed to the Selma & Meridian Railway Company, in 1866,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Zeller's Lessee v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Alexander v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Gayetty v. BethuneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  4. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Copeland v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rountree v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Jackson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Nelson v. HardinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Ray v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Lindsey v. AldridgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API